Cluster · cls_tok_wif_1
WIF3 wallets · 12m window
WIF: stable smart-wallet alphas re-entered inside an 11-min window — pattern consistent with organic accumulation.
Mock cluster detail · cls_tok_wif_1 · mock · refreshed 20m ago · TTL 60s
Timing distribution
When wallets entered the cluster
Histogram across the 12-minute observation window. Front-loaded entries are characteristic of organic interest; tail-heavy entries can indicate copy followers.
Shared funding
Are these wallets one actor?
Wallets funded from the same upstream source within minutes of each other are often a single actor across many addresses.
No common upstream funder linkage observed across the cluster wallets.
Participating wallets
Who entered, in what order
Quality weighting uses each wallet's Wallet Alpha score. Tracked wallets are flagged.
Liquidity impact
What this cluster moved
Estimates the cluster's notional vs the pool depth at the time. Thin pools amplify price impact and exit slippage.
Total notional
$97.3K
Pool depth at time
$38.4M
Est price impact
~0.3%
Comparable clusters
Clusters that looked like this
Pattern-matched against historical clusters of the same type. Outcomes do not predict outcomes.
- WIF90% similarsuccessful
Risk evidence
What the engine is flagging on this cluster
Each item is a discrete observation with its own source, evaluator and confidence.
Evidence stack
MODERATE risk · 1 watch · 55% confidence
watch
- watch
Cluster type "organic smart accumulation" classified at 55% confidence.
cluster pattern·heuristic·Mock cluster classifier·55% confidence
Scores
Token-level intelligence scores
Each score is versioned and explains itself. Confidence reflects how much weight to put on the value.
Smart Money Interest Score
62
v0.1.0-draft · 66% confidence
- · Score 62 interpreted via "0–35 little interest · 36–60 some · 61–80 strong · 81–100 unusually strong.".
- · Inputs considered: Active smart wallets, Smart-wallet net USD.
Alert Confidence Score
40
v0.1.0-draft · 64% confidence
- · Score 40 interpreted via "0–35 noisy · 36–60 mixed · 61–80 reliable · 81–100 high agreement.".
- · Inputs considered: Input agreement, Historical precision.
Rug Probability Score
79
v0.1.0-draft · 55% confidence
- · Score 79 interpreted via "0–20 low · 21–50 elevated · 51–80 high · 81–100 critical.".
- · Inputs considered: LP lock state, Mint/freeze authority, Deployer history.
Research output only. Cluster classification is heuristic — verify before acting.
Research and analytics only. Smart Money never holds your funds, signs transactions, or executes trades. Users always sign in their own wallet.