STerminal
Connect
Smart Money Inflow 1h$6.24M+4.62%
Net Buy Pressure$2.41M+1.24%
Active Signals12
Tracked Smart Wallets312
Heating Narratives3 / 6+18.40%
Smart Money InflowWIF+$1.24M14w · 82% conf
Fresh Wallet AccumulationGRIFT+$184K8w · 64% conf
Insider ClusterRUGZ-$94.0K4w · 91% conf
Whale EntryPEPE+$352K1w · 76% conf
KOL Wallet MovementBONK+$84.0K3w · 58% conf
Exit RiskMEME2-$42.0K6w · 72% conf
Smart Money InflowWIF+$1.24M14w · 82% conf
Fresh Wallet AccumulationGRIFT+$184K8w · 64% conf
Insider ClusterRUGZ-$94.0K4w · 91% conf
Whale EntryPEPE+$352K1w · 76% conf
KOL Wallet MovementBONK+$84.0K3w · 58% conf
Exit RiskMEME2-$42.0K6w · 72% conf
Cluster feedCluster detailSolanaMock dataStaleDegraded

Cluster · cls_tok_wif_0

WIF11 wallets · 11m window

WIF: stable smart-wallet alphas re-entered inside an 11-min window — pattern consistent with organic accumulation.

Organic smart accumulation90% type confidencedetected 25m ago

Quality

87/100

Alpha-weighted

Risk verdict

moderate

90% confidence

Token

WIF

Open token page

Cluster detail · review caveatsStaleDegradedExpired payload
Providersheliusai_summary

Mock cluster detail · cls_tok_wif_0 · mock · refreshed 20m ago · TTL 60s

Timing distribution

When wallets entered the cluster

Histogram across the 11-minute observation window. Front-loaded entries are characteristic of organic interest; tail-heavy entries can indicate copy followers.

+0m
2
+1m
2
+2m
0
+3m
1
+4m
2
+5m
0
+6m
1
+7m
2
+8m
0
+9m
1

Shared funding

Are these wallets one actor?

Wallets funded from the same upstream source within minutes of each other are often a single actor across many addresses.

Not detected

No common upstream funder linkage observed across the cluster wallets.

Participating wallets

Who entered, in what order

Quality weighting uses each wallet's Wallet Alpha score. Tracked wallets are flagged.

Liquidity impact

What this cluster moved

Estimates the cluster's notional vs the pool depth at the time. Thin pools amplify price impact and exit slippage.

Total notional

$358K

Pool depth at time

$38.4M

Est price impact

~0.9%

Comparable clusters

Clusters that looked like this

Pattern-matched against historical clusters of the same type. Outcomes do not predict outcomes.

Risk evidence

What the engine is flagging on this cluster

Each item is a discrete observation with its own source, evaluator and confidence.

Evidence stack

MODERATE risk · 1 watch · 90% confidence

watch

  • Cluster type "organic smart accumulation" classified at 90% confidence.

    watch
    cluster pattern·heuristic·Mock cluster classifier·90% confidence

Scores

Token-level intelligence scores

Each score is versioned and explains itself. Confidence reflects how much weight to put on the value.

  • Smart Money Interest Score

    63

    v0.1.0-draft · 67% confidence

    • · Score 63 interpreted via "0–35 little interest · 36–60 some · 61–80 strong · 81–100 unusually strong.".
    • · Inputs considered: Active smart wallets, Smart-wallet net USD.

  • Alert Confidence Score

    41

    v0.1.0-draft · 63% confidence

    • · Score 41 interpreted via "0–35 noisy · 36–60 mixed · 61–80 reliable · 81–100 high agreement.".
    • · Inputs considered: Input agreement, Historical precision.

  • Rug Probability Score

    80

    v0.1.0-draft · 56% confidence

    • · Score 80 interpreted via "0–20 low · 21–50 elevated · 51–80 high · 81–100 critical.".
    • · Inputs considered: LP lock state, Mint/freeze authority, Deployer history.

Research output only. Cluster classification is heuristic — verify before acting.

Research and analytics only. Smart Money never holds your funds, signs transactions, or executes trades. Users always sign in their own wallet.

Cluster cls_tok_wif_0 · Smart Money Terminal