Cluster · cls_tok_bonk_0
BONK3 wallets · 9m window
BONK: a single large position seeded a wider follower entry inside the same hour.
Mock cluster detail · cls_tok_bonk_0 · mock · refreshed 20m ago · TTL 60s
Timing distribution
When wallets entered the cluster
Histogram across the 9-minute observation window. Front-loaded entries are characteristic of organic interest; tail-heavy entries can indicate copy followers.
Shared funding
Are these wallets one actor?
Wallets funded from the same upstream source within minutes of each other are often a single actor across many addresses.
No common upstream funder linkage observed across the cluster wallets.
Participating wallets
Who entered, in what order
Quality weighting uses each wallet's Wallet Alpha score. Tracked wallets are flagged.
Liquidity impact
What this cluster moved
Estimates the cluster's notional vs the pool depth at the time. Thin pools amplify price impact and exit slippage.
Total notional
$195K
Pool depth at time
$14.2M
Est price impact
~1.4%
Comparable clusters
Clusters that looked like this
Pattern-matched against historical clusters of the same type. Outcomes do not predict outcomes.
- AGENT90% similaralive
- ARBI78% similaralive
- MEME266% similaralive
Risk evidence
What the engine is flagging on this cluster
Each item is a discrete observation with its own source, evaluator and confidence.
Evidence stack
MODERATE risk · 1 watch · 82% confidence
watch
- watch
Cluster type "whale led momentum" classified at 82% confidence.
cluster pattern·heuristic·Mock cluster classifier·82% confidence
Scores
Token-level intelligence scores
Each score is versioned and explains itself. Confidence reflects how much weight to put on the value.
Smart Money Interest Score
75
v0.1.0-draft · 85% confidence
- · Score 75 interpreted via "0–35 little interest · 36–60 some · 61–80 strong · 81–100 unusually strong.".
- · Inputs considered: Active smart wallets, Smart-wallet net USD.
Alert Confidence Score
73
v0.1.0-draft · 77% confidence
- · Score 73 interpreted via "0–35 noisy · 36–60 mixed · 61–80 reliable · 81–100 high agreement.".
- · Inputs considered: Input agreement, Historical precision.
Rug Probability Score
70
v0.1.0-draft · 74% confidence
- · Score 70 interpreted via "0–20 low · 21–50 elevated · 51–80 high · 81–100 critical.".
- · Inputs considered: LP lock state, Mint/freeze authority, Deployer history.
Research output only. Cluster classification is heuristic — verify before acting.
Research and analytics only. Smart Money never holds your funds, signs transactions, or executes trades. Users always sign in their own wallet.