STerminal
Smart Money Inflow 1h$6.24M+4.62%
Net Buy Pressure$2.41M+1.24%
Active Signals12
Tracked Smart Wallets312
Heating Narratives3 / 6+18.40%
Smart Money InflowWIF+$1.24M14w · 82% conf
Fresh Wallet AccumulationGRIFT+$184K8w · 64% conf
Insider ClusterRUGZ-$94.0K4w · 91% conf
Whale EntryPEPE+$352K1w · 76% conf
KOL Wallet MovementBONK+$84.0K3w · 58% conf
Exit RiskMEME2-$42.0K6w · 72% conf
Smart Money InflowWIF+$1.24M14w · 82% conf
Fresh Wallet AccumulationGRIFT+$184K8w · 64% conf
Insider ClusterRUGZ-$94.0K4w · 91% conf
Whale EntryPEPE+$352K1w · 76% conf
KOL Wallet MovementBONK+$84.0K3w · 58% conf
Exit RiskMEME2-$42.0K6w · 72% conf
Cluster feedCluster detailBaseMock dataStaleDegraded

Cluster · cls_tok_agent_0

AGENT5 wallets · 8m window

AGENT: a single large position seeded a wider follower entry inside the same hour.

Whale-led momentum75% type confidencedetected 22m ago

Quality

60/100

Alpha-weighted

Risk verdict

moderate

75% confidence

Token

AGENT

Open token page

Cluster detail · review caveatsStaleDegradedExpired payload
Providersheliusai_summary

Mock cluster detail · cls_tok_agent_0 · mock · refreshed 20m ago · TTL 60s

Timing distribution

When wallets entered the cluster

Histogram across the 8-minute observation window. Front-loaded entries are characteristic of organic interest; tail-heavy entries can indicate copy followers.

+0m
3
+1m
1
+2m
0
+3m
1

Shared funding

Are these wallets one actor?

Wallets funded from the same upstream source within minutes of each other are often a single actor across many addresses.

Not detected

No common upstream funder linkage observed across the cluster wallets.

Participating wallets

Who entered, in what order

Quality weighting uses each wallet's Wallet Alpha score. Tracked wallets are flagged.

  • #1ICEBERGTrackedbuyα 88$70.1K8m ago
  • #2ALPHASEERTrackedbuyα 84$70.1K7m ago
  • #3OXSMARTTrackedbuyα 62$70.2K6m ago
  • #4WALLET03buyα 43$70.2K5m ago
  • #5WALLET04buyα 39$70.2K4m ago

Liquidity impact

What this cluster moved

Estimates the cluster's notional vs the pool depth at the time. Thin pools amplify price impact and exit slippage.

Total notional

$351K

Pool depth at time

$2.40M

Est price impact

~14.6%

Thin pool

Comparable clusters

Clusters that looked like this

Pattern-matched against historical clusters of the same type. Outcomes do not predict outcomes.

Risk evidence

What the engine is flagging on this cluster

Each item is a discrete observation with its own source, evaluator and confidence.

Evidence stack

MODERATE risk · 1 watch · 75% confidence

watch

  • Cluster type "whale led momentum" classified at 75% confidence.

    watch
    cluster pattern·heuristic·Mock cluster classifier·75% confidence

Scores

Token-level intelligence scores

Each score is versioned and explains itself. Confidence reflects how much weight to put on the value.

  • Smart Money Interest Score

    44

    v0.1.0-draft · 58% confidence

    • · Score 44 interpreted via "0–35 little interest · 36–60 some · 61–80 strong · 81–100 unusually strong.".
    • · Inputs considered: Active smart wallets, Smart-wallet net USD.
  • Alert Confidence Score

    56

    v0.1.0-draft · 60% confidence

    • · Score 56 interpreted via "0–35 noisy · 36–60 mixed · 61–80 reliable · 81–100 high agreement.".
    • · Inputs considered: Input agreement, Historical precision.
  • Rug Probability Score

    39

    v0.1.0-draft · 79% confidence

    • · Score 39 interpreted via "0–20 low · 21–50 elevated · 51–80 high · 81–100 critical.".
    • · Inputs considered: LP lock state, Mint/freeze authority, Deployer history.

Research output only. Cluster classification is heuristic — verify before acting.

Research and analytics only. Smart Money never holds your funds, signs transactions, or executes trades. Users always sign in their own wallet.

Cluster cls_tok_agent_0 · Smart Money Terminal