Cluster · cls_tok_pepe_1
PEPE11 wallets · 26m window
PEPE: multiple wallets entered in a short window. Cluster type is below the confidence floor for classification.
Mock cluster detail · cls_tok_pepe_1 · mock · refreshed 20m ago · TTL 60s
Timing distribution
When wallets entered the cluster
Histogram across the 26-minute observation window. Front-loaded entries are characteristic of organic interest; tail-heavy entries can indicate copy followers.
Shared funding
Are these wallets one actor?
Wallets funded from the same upstream source within minutes of each other are often a single actor across many addresses.
No common upstream funder linkage observed across the cluster wallets.
Participating wallets
Who entered, in what order
Quality weighting uses each wallet's Wallet Alpha score. Tracked wallets are flagged.
- #1ICEBERGTrackedbuyα 88$11.7K26m ago
- #2ALPHASEERTrackedbuyα 84$11.8K25m ago
- #3OXSMARTTrackedbuyα 62$11.8K24m ago
- #4WALLET03buyα 43$11.8K23m ago
- #5WALLET04buyα 39$11.8K22m ago
- #6WALLET05buyα 35$11.9K21m ago
- #7WALLET06buyα 31$11.9K20m ago
- #8WALLET07buyα 27$11.9K19m ago
- #9WALLET08buyα 23$12.0K18m ago
- #10WALLET09buyα 20$12.0K17m ago
- #11WALLET10buyα 20$12.0K16m ago
Liquidity impact
What this cluster moved
Estimates the cluster's notional vs the pool depth at the time. Thin pools amplify price impact and exit slippage.
Total notional
$131K
Pool depth at time
$22.1M
Est price impact
~0.6%
Comparable clusters
Clusters that looked like this
Pattern-matched against historical clusters of the same type. Outcomes do not predict outcomes.
- MEME290% similaralive
- PEPE78% similaralive
- AGENT66% similaralive
Risk evidence
What the engine is flagging on this cluster
Each item is a discrete observation with its own source, evaluator and confidence.
Evidence stack
MODERATE risk · 1 watch · 63% confidence
watch
- watch
Cluster type "uncertain" classified at 63% confidence.
cluster pattern·heuristic·Mock cluster classifier·63% confidence
Scores
Token-level intelligence scores
Each score is versioned and explains itself. Confidence reflects how much weight to put on the value.
Smart Money Interest Score
40
v0.1.0-draft · 78% confidence
- · Score 40 interpreted via "0–35 little interest · 36–60 some · 61–80 strong · 81–100 unusually strong.".
- · Inputs considered: Active smart wallets, Smart-wallet net USD.
Alert Confidence Score
64
v0.1.0-draft · 72% confidence
- · Score 64 interpreted via "0–35 noisy · 36–60 mixed · 61–80 reliable · 81–100 high agreement.".
- · Inputs considered: Input agreement, Historical precision.
Rug Probability Score
37
v0.1.0-draft · 75% confidence
- · Score 37 interpreted via "0–20 low · 21–50 elevated · 51–80 high · 81–100 critical.".
- · Inputs considered: LP lock state, Mint/freeze authority, Deployer history.
Research output only. Cluster classification is heuristic — verify before acting.
Research and analytics only. Smart Money never holds your funds, signs transactions, or executes trades. Users always sign in their own wallet.