Cluster · cls_tok_grift_1
GRIFT8 wallets · 26m window
GRIFT: bundled entry across wallets sharing recent funding lineage — treat as one actor across many addresses.
Mock cluster detail · cls_tok_grift_1 · mock · refreshed 20m ago · TTL 60s
Timing distribution
When wallets entered the cluster
Histogram across the 26-minute observation window. Front-loaded entries are characteristic of organic interest; tail-heavy entries can indicate copy followers.
Shared funding
Are these wallets one actor?
Wallets funded from the same upstream source within minutes of each other are often a single actor across many addresses.
- Funder0x854e…4e8ffanout 5heuristic · 80%
Participating wallets
Who entered, in what order
Quality weighting uses each wallet's Wallet Alpha score. Tracked wallets are flagged.
Liquidity impact
What this cluster moved
Estimates the cluster's notional vs the pool depth at the time. Thin pools amplify price impact and exit slippage.
Total notional
$650K
Pool depth at time
$980K
Est price impact
~40.0%
Thin pool
Comparable clusters
Clusters that looked like this
Pattern-matched against historical clusters of the same type. Outcomes do not predict outcomes.
- RUGZ90% similarrugged
Risk evidence
What the engine is flagging on this cluster
Each item is a discrete observation with its own source, evaluator and confidence.
Evidence stack
ELEVATED risk · 2 elevated · 1 watch · 78% confidence
elevated
- elevated
5 entry wallets share a common funder address.
When several wallets are funded from the same source within minutes of each other, on-chain activity may be one actor across many addresses.
same funder cluster·heuristic·Mock funder graph·76% confidence - elevated
Cluster type "insider bundled launch" classified at 87% confidence.
cluster pattern·heuristic·Mock cluster classifier·87% confidence
watch
- watch
8 wallets younger than 36h moved in the same 12-min window.
Coordinated entry from fresh wallets often precedes a quick exit. Treat the entry as a signal cluster, not as independent confirmation.
fresh wallet cluster·heuristic·Mock cluster detector·68% confidence
Scores
Token-level intelligence scores
Each score is versioned and explains itself. Confidence reflects how much weight to put on the value.
Smart Money Interest Score
92
v0.1.0-draft · 66% confidence
- · Score 92 interpreted via "0–35 little interest · 36–60 some · 61–80 strong · 81–100 unusually strong.".
- · Inputs considered: Active smart wallets, Smart-wallet net USD.
Alert Confidence Score
42
v0.1.0-draft · 84% confidence
- · Score 42 interpreted via "0–35 noisy · 36–60 mixed · 61–80 reliable · 81–100 high agreement.".
- · Inputs considered: Input agreement, Historical precision.
Rug Probability Score
87
v0.1.0-draft · 63% confidence
- · Score 87 interpreted via "0–20 low · 21–50 elevated · 51–80 high · 81–100 critical.".
- · Inputs considered: LP lock state, Mint/freeze authority, Deployer history.
Research output only. Cluster classification is heuristic — verify before acting.
Research and analytics only. Smart Money never holds your funds, signs transactions, or executes trades. Users always sign in their own wallet.