STerminal
Smart Money Inflow 1h$6.24M+4.62%
Net Buy Pressure$2.41M+1.24%
Active Signals12
Tracked Smart Wallets312
Heating Narratives3 / 6+18.40%
Smart Money InflowWIF+$1.24M14w · 82% conf
Fresh Wallet AccumulationGRIFT+$184K8w · 64% conf
Insider ClusterRUGZ-$94.0K4w · 91% conf
Whale EntryPEPE+$352K1w · 76% conf
KOL Wallet MovementBONK+$84.0K3w · 58% conf
Exit RiskMEME2-$42.0K6w · 72% conf
Smart Money InflowWIF+$1.24M14w · 82% conf
Fresh Wallet AccumulationGRIFT+$184K8w · 64% conf
Insider ClusterRUGZ-$94.0K4w · 91% conf
Whale EntryPEPE+$352K1w · 76% conf
KOL Wallet MovementBONK+$84.0K3w · 58% conf
Exit RiskMEME2-$42.0K6w · 72% conf
Cluster feedCluster detailBaseMock dataStaleDegraded

Cluster · cls_tok_grift_1

GRIFT8 wallets · 26m window

GRIFT: bundled entry across wallets sharing recent funding lineage — treat as one actor across many addresses.

Insider / bundled launch87% type confidencedetected 2h ago

Quality

42/100

Alpha-weighted

Risk verdict

elevated

78% confidence

Token

GRIFT

Open token page

Cluster detail · review caveatsStaleDegradedExpired payload
Providersheliusai_summary

Mock cluster detail · cls_tok_grift_1 · mock · refreshed 20m ago · TTL 60s

Timing distribution

When wallets entered the cluster

Histogram across the 26-minute observation window. Front-loaded entries are characteristic of organic interest; tail-heavy entries can indicate copy followers.

+0m
3
+1m
1
+2m
0
+3m
2
+4m
1
+5m
0
+6m
1

Shared funding

Are these wallets one actor?

Wallets funded from the same upstream source within minutes of each other are often a single actor across many addresses.

Detected · max fanout 5
  • Funder0x854e…4e8ffanout 5heuristic · 80%

Participating wallets

Who entered, in what order

Quality weighting uses each wallet's Wallet Alpha score. Tracked wallets are flagged.

  • #1ICEBERGTrackedbuyα 88$81.1K26m ago
  • #2ALPHASEERTrackedbuyα 84$81.1K25m ago
  • #3OXSMARTTrackedbuyα 62$81.2K24m ago
  • #4WALLET03buyα 43$81.2K23m ago
  • #5WALLET04buyα 39$81.2K22m ago
  • #6WALLET05buyα 35$81.3K21m ago
  • #7WALLET06buyα 31$81.3K20m ago
  • #8WALLET07buyα 27$81.3K19m ago

Liquidity impact

What this cluster moved

Estimates the cluster's notional vs the pool depth at the time. Thin pools amplify price impact and exit slippage.

Total notional

$650K

Pool depth at time

$980K

Est price impact

~40.0%

Thin pool

Comparable clusters

Clusters that looked like this

Pattern-matched against historical clusters of the same type. Outcomes do not predict outcomes.

Risk evidence

What the engine is flagging on this cluster

Each item is a discrete observation with its own source, evaluator and confidence.

Evidence stack

ELEVATED risk · 2 elevated · 1 watch · 78% confidence

elevated

  • 5 entry wallets share a common funder address.

    When several wallets are funded from the same source within minutes of each other, on-chain activity may be one actor across many addresses.

    elevated
    same funder cluster·heuristic·Mock funder graph·76% confidence
  • Cluster type "insider bundled launch" classified at 87% confidence.

    elevated
    cluster pattern·heuristic·Mock cluster classifier·87% confidence

watch

  • 8 wallets younger than 36h moved in the same 12-min window.

    Coordinated entry from fresh wallets often precedes a quick exit. Treat the entry as a signal cluster, not as independent confirmation.

    watch
    fresh wallet cluster·heuristic·Mock cluster detector·68% confidence

Scores

Token-level intelligence scores

Each score is versioned and explains itself. Confidence reflects how much weight to put on the value.

  • Smart Money Interest Score

    92

    v0.1.0-draft · 66% confidence

    • · Score 92 interpreted via "0–35 little interest · 36–60 some · 61–80 strong · 81–100 unusually strong.".
    • · Inputs considered: Active smart wallets, Smart-wallet net USD.
  • Alert Confidence Score

    42

    v0.1.0-draft · 84% confidence

    • · Score 42 interpreted via "0–35 noisy · 36–60 mixed · 61–80 reliable · 81–100 high agreement.".
    • · Inputs considered: Input agreement, Historical precision.
  • Rug Probability Score

    87

    v0.1.0-draft · 63% confidence

    • · Score 87 interpreted via "0–20 low · 21–50 elevated · 51–80 high · 81–100 critical.".
    • · Inputs considered: LP lock state, Mint/freeze authority, Deployer history.

Research output only. Cluster classification is heuristic — verify before acting.

Research and analytics only. Smart Money never holds your funds, signs transactions, or executes trades. Users always sign in their own wallet.

Cluster cls_tok_grift_1 · Smart Money Terminal