Cluster · cls_tok_grift_0
GRIFT7 wallets · 25m window
GRIFT: round-trip volume across closely-linked wallets — pattern consistent with wash flow rather than directional intent.
Mock cluster detail · cls_tok_grift_0 · mock · refreshed 20m ago · TTL 60s
Timing distribution
When wallets entered the cluster
Histogram across the 25-minute observation window. Front-loaded entries are characteristic of organic interest; tail-heavy entries can indicate copy followers.
Shared funding
Are these wallets one actor?
Wallets funded from the same upstream source within minutes of each other are often a single actor across many addresses.
No common upstream funder linkage observed across the cluster wallets.
Participating wallets
Who entered, in what order
Quality weighting uses each wallet's Wallet Alpha score. Tracked wallets are flagged.
Liquidity impact
What this cluster moved
Estimates the cluster's notional vs the pool depth at the time. Thin pools amplify price impact and exit slippage.
Total notional
$568K
Pool depth at time
$980K
Est price impact
~40.0%
Thin pool
Comparable clusters
Clusters that looked like this
Pattern-matched against historical clusters of the same type. Outcomes do not predict outcomes.
- RUGZ90% similaralive
Risk evidence
What the engine is flagging on this cluster
Each item is a discrete observation with its own source, evaluator and confidence.
Evidence stack
ELEVATED risk · 1 elevated · 1 watch · 84% confidence
elevated
- elevated
Top 10 wallets hold 64% of supply.
Concentration above 50% leaves the price sensitive to a small number of holders' decisions. Inspect the top wallets before acting on any other signal.
holder concentration·deterministic·Mock holder snapshot·82% confidence
watch
- watch
Cluster type "wash or noise" classified at 86% confidence.
cluster pattern·heuristic·Mock cluster classifier·86% confidence
Scores
Token-level intelligence scores
Each score is versioned and explains itself. Confidence reflects how much weight to put on the value.
Smart Money Interest Score
91
v0.1.0-draft · 67% confidence
- · Score 91 interpreted via "0–35 little interest · 36–60 some · 61–80 strong · 81–100 unusually strong.".
- · Inputs considered: Active smart wallets, Smart-wallet net USD.
Alert Confidence Score
41
v0.1.0-draft · 85% confidence
- · Score 41 interpreted via "0–35 noisy · 36–60 mixed · 61–80 reliable · 81–100 high agreement.".
- · Inputs considered: Input agreement, Historical precision.
Rug Probability Score
86
v0.1.0-draft · 64% confidence
- · Score 86 interpreted via "0–20 low · 21–50 elevated · 51–80 high · 81–100 critical.".
- · Inputs considered: LP lock state, Mint/freeze authority, Deployer history.
Research output only. Cluster classification is heuristic — verify before acting.
Research and analytics only. Smart Money never holds your funds, signs transactions, or executes trades. Users always sign in their own wallet.