Cluster · cls_tok_arbi_1
ARBI11 wallets · 32m window
ARBI: multiple wallets entered in a short window. Cluster type is below the confidence floor for classification.
Mock cluster detail · cls_tok_arbi_1 · mock · refreshed 20m ago · TTL 60s
Timing distribution
When wallets entered the cluster
Histogram across the 32-minute observation window. Front-loaded entries are characteristic of organic interest; tail-heavy entries can indicate copy followers.
Shared funding
Are these wallets one actor?
Wallets funded from the same upstream source within minutes of each other are often a single actor across many addresses.
No common upstream funder linkage observed across the cluster wallets.
Participating wallets
Who entered, in what order
Quality weighting uses each wallet's Wallet Alpha score. Tracked wallets are flagged.
- #1ICEBERGTrackedbuyα 88$37.0K32m ago
- #2ALPHASEERTrackedbuyα 84$37.0K31m ago
- #3OXSMARTTrackedbuyα 62$37.1K30m ago
- #4WALLET03buyα 43$37.1K29m ago
- #5WALLET04buyα 39$37.1K28m ago
- #6WALLET05buyα 35$37.2K27m ago
- #7WALLET06buyα 31$37.2K26m ago
- #8WALLET07buyα 27$37.2K25m ago
- #9WALLET08buyα 23$37.2K24m ago
- #10WALLET09buyα 20$37.3K23m ago
- #11WALLET10buyα 20$37.3K22m ago
Liquidity impact
What this cluster moved
Estimates the cluster's notional vs the pool depth at the time. Thin pools amplify price impact and exit slippage.
Total notional
$409K
Pool depth at time
$12.4M
Est price impact
~3.3%
Comparable clusters
Clusters that looked like this
Pattern-matched against historical clusters of the same type. Outcomes do not predict outcomes.
- MEME290% similaralive
- PEPE78% similaralive
- AGENT66% similaralive
Risk evidence
What the engine is flagging on this cluster
Each item is a discrete observation with its own source, evaluator and confidence.
Evidence stack
MODERATE risk · 1 watch · 81% confidence
watch
- watch
Cluster type "uncertain" classified at 81% confidence.
cluster pattern·heuristic·Mock cluster classifier·81% confidence
Scores
Token-level intelligence scores
Each score is versioned and explains itself. Confidence reflects how much weight to put on the value.
Smart Money Interest Score
86
v0.1.0-draft · 56% confidence
- · Score 86 interpreted via "0–35 little interest · 36–60 some · 61–80 strong · 81–100 unusually strong.".
- · Inputs considered: Active smart wallets, Smart-wallet net USD.
Alert Confidence Score
84
v0.1.0-draft · 62% confidence
- · Score 84 interpreted via "0–35 noisy · 36–60 mixed · 61–80 reliable · 81–100 high agreement.".
- · Inputs considered: Input agreement, Historical precision.
Rug Probability Score
59
v0.1.0-draft · 59% confidence
- · Score 59 interpreted via "0–20 low · 21–50 elevated · 51–80 high · 81–100 critical.".
- · Inputs considered: LP lock state, Mint/freeze authority, Deployer history.
Research output only. Cluster classification is heuristic — verify before acting.
Research and analytics only. Smart Money never holds your funds, signs transactions, or executes trades. Users always sign in their own wallet.